I remain convinced that the rating system used on this site is useless. First of all, all the artist ever sees is a score which means absolutely nothing. The only thing an artist sees is when some makes a remark about a piece. These are usually things like, "nice job"" or "well done"". This offers no criticism of art art value. I recent hung a painting on this site which had been receiving rave reviews on other site. But here a low score caused its rejection from the main gallery. Yet I have no idea of why there were low scores here. Only one remark was made it wasn't very complimentary and seemed to me to be totally off the mark. Artist thrive on valid criticisms of their art but here that never happens. I don't need to know the name of a critic but it would be very nice to know what they had to say and why they either marked high or low. Just my opinion.